Jack is a human who was exposed to Element Zero when she was in the womb. Jack has the following proficiencies: Heavy Pistols and Shotguns and the following Powers: Shockwave, Pull, Subject Zero and Warp Ammo. Jack can fight alongside Commander Shepard. Consequences.Jack is a Companion or potencial Companion for Mass Effect 2. When you make it others problems by expressing yourself, you are fair game. So get used to it.Īnd if you are so fragile that people living their lives by their own rules is a problem for you. And many people in the USA seem to agree. I don't give one flat crap what you think but when you start trying to force your views about how others should be living their lives, it's my business. You talk about wanting a society that's "respectful" of others but you really mean you want a society that plays by your rules. Those days are over, and I'm sure it's quite a shock. You want to continue as in the past where people had to beg for the ruling class to grant them some legitimacy through appealing to their egos. That's where you consistently get into trouble, worrying about others instead of running your own life. Your opinions about other peoples lives isn't worth the time it takes to express. What people like you never seem to get is that you don't need to 'get it'. But what you propose is that you will force your BS on me, so I GTFO out of your life while you don't GTFO of mine. So we can move to a society that's more understanding or respectful of each other. The only reason to appeal to another person (which you misconstrued as kissing a$$), is because you want the other person to understand the maybe that's person own understanding is not the same as yours and either you want to have the person shift their views on their own, or at least respect the fact that there are difference of opinions. Don't you see the irony of your own statement? You see, when you are trying to force someone on how to act or think, you are getting into the person's life. In a free society, you can't force people on what they "should" think according to your own reality. So if I think the whole pronouns BS is BS, and I let the thought known, I should "be able to deal with the blowback" and there are "consequences to it" WTF Ok, fascist (in re: "And if you can't, you better be able to deal with the blowback. Lies are lies and should be called out as such. It's a well used tactic to mix factual attributions with lies and half-truths to build trust and lend credence to the mistruths. Įlsewhere that person attributed supporting the riots to Kamala Harris, which as I correctly asserted, did not back the riots but did support our constitutional right to protest: There are many references to tons of people being arrested, but I'll just go for Kenosha 277 charged. "that was nothing compared to the riots earlier in 2020 that not one person was charged" "not to mention that antifa people already admitted that they stormed the capital first. I'll go ahead and quote them and provide the links refuting them I can only assume that you didn't read up further into the thread and identify the facts in dispute around the events of the 6th. When it's your house or place of work that's affected, it suddenly becomes personal. I think the DC riots just got more action from Congress because the politicians finally felt the fear Americans in affected cities have been going through all year during the riots. Rioting and violence are wrong (unlike peaceful protests of any agenda that I think we all support, at least their right to do so), whether in the form of looting stores or invading the capital building. These examples are easy to find and don't require constraining yourself to right-wing media, though it's admittedly easier to find there. The Chief of Police in Portland, OR spoke publicly about needing to retake the police station after protesters took it over along with several other blocks of the city. Here's an article I found at the top of my first search, talking about 25 people killed in the riots during 2020 from the left-leaning, staunchly anti-Trump Guardian in the UK (i.e., the opposite of a right-wing US-myopic site). Everything he listed is a provably correct fact, easily verified even on Google, which is hardly a friend to the right. That's the classic case of adversarial views because of belief in different facts. It concerns me if you believe his facts are wrong. Do you dispute any of them? This may all be off-topic, but as he points out, he's responding to others. BrianCO, my post here may be too late to be seen, but I just read this exchange on Monday and need to ask: do you believe any of the facts that Copiandor wrote are incorrect? I'm not referring to the opinions or conclusions, just the facts about events that occurred.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |